🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from chaos. Although the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this same narrative rather than undercutting it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was in essence a selection process with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state in practice.

• The shortlist included various figures, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who researched his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the events said the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. His influence is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to examine.